USD
A single-compound listing names one catalog subject, while a blend listing explicitly names multiple components. The safest comparison keeps every displayed component, the exact SKU and the listed package details together.
Single-compound vs blend: the catalog difference
| Field | Single-compound listing | Blend listing |
|---|---|---|
| Title | One displayed compound name | Two or more displayed component names |
| Search method | SKU or full name plus strength | SKU plus the complete component list |
| Main ambiguity | Confusing adjacent strengths | Shortening the title to only one component |
| What not to infer | Composition, purity, equivalence, suitability or expected effect beyond the facts shown | |
How to record a blend accurately
- Copy the full title without dropping a component.
- Record the exact SKU and displayed strength.
- Confirm whether the displayed strength is presented as a total or component-specific value; if the page does not say, do not guess.
- Record the package quantity separately.
- Use the live page when asking support to verify the listing.
Why names alone are not a certificate
A title is a catalog identifier. It is not a certificate of analysis and should not be treated as laboratory verification. If a genuine COA or testing document exists for a specific product, it should be linked to that exact product and document version; a generic quality claim is not a substitute.
Frequently asked questions
Can I shorten a blend to its first component?
No. That can make the listing look like a different single-compound product.
Does the displayed total prove the amount of each component?
Not unless the product page explicitly provides that breakdown.
Where should a genuine COA be linked?
To the exact product or batch it documents, with enough information to match the record.